The NIRF ranking is the Indian government’s annual league table of higher education institutions, built from data that institutions submit themselves and scored on five weighted groups of measures. It is published by the Ministry of Education each year as India Rankings, and the most recent edition, India Rankings 2025, was released on 4 September 2025.
For vice chancellors, college managements, lenders and suppliers, the results matter beyond prestige. A place in the top 100 now feeds into at least one central government scheme, and the parameters shape what institutions measure and report. This guide sets out how the framework works, what it rewards and where it stands as of November 2026.
What the NIRF ranking is and where it came from
The National Institutional Ranking Framework was approved by what was then the Ministry of Human Resource Development and launched by the minister on 29 September 2015. Its stated job is to set out a method for ranking institutions “across the country”.
The India Rankings 2025 report traces the groundwork to a ministry workshop on 21 August 2014 and a 16 member Core Committee appointed on 29 October 2014 to identify the broad parameters. The first rankings followed in 2016, covering universities and three subject domains.
According to the same report, the exercise is run by the NIRF team at the National Board of Accreditation in collaboration with the INFLIBNET Centre in Gandhinagar, which also manages the website. Institutions are not ranked unless they apply: the report describes applicants as “offering themselves for ranking”.
How many institutions take part
Participation in the NIRF ranking has grown each cycle. The ministry’s press release for the 2025 edition says 14,163 applications came from 7,692 unique institutions, against 2,426 institutions and 3,565 applications in 2016. Of the 2025 applications, 4,045 were for the Overall list, 1,584 for Engineering and 4,030 from general degree colleges.
The ministry attributed the rise to recognition of the exercise as fair and transparent. Whatever the reason, an institution that stays out of the NIRF ranking now does so while several thousand peers submit data, which makes absence from the lists more visible than it was in the early years.

The 2025 edition covered 9 categories and 8 subject domains, 17 lists in all. The categories are Overall, Universities, Colleges, Research Institutions, Innovation, Open Universities, Skill Universities, State Public Universities and Sustainable Development Goals. The subject domains are Engineering, Management, Pharmacy, Medical, Dental, Law, Architecture and Planning, and Agriculture and Allied Sectors.
Lists have been added to the NIRF ranking over time. The press release dates Research Institutions to 2021, Innovation to 2023, and State Public, Open and Skill Universities to 2024. The Sustainable Development Goals list was “introduced for the first time” in 2025.
The five NIRF parameters and their weights
Every institution in the NIRF ranking is scored on the same five groups, which the framework names as Teaching, Learning and Resources; Research and Professional Practice; Graduation Outcomes; Outreach and Inclusivity; and Perception. The 2025 report gives the generic weights and the marks allocated to each sub-parameter, set out below.
| Parameter group | Weight | Sub-parameters (marks out of 100) |
|---|---|---|
| Teaching, Learning and Resources | 0.30 | Student strength (20), faculty student ratio (25), faculty with PhD (20), financial resources and utilisation (20), online education (10), multiple entry and exit, Indian Knowledge System and regional languages (5) |
| Research and Professional Practice | 0.30 | Publications (35), citations (35), patents (15), research projects (15) |
| Graduation Outcomes | 0.20 | Placement and higher studies (40), PhD students (20), university examinations (15), median salary (25) |
| Outreach and Inclusivity | 0.10 | Regional diversity (30), women diversity (30), economically and socially challenged students (20), physically challenged students (20) |
| Perception | 0.10 | Peer perception from academic peers and employers (100) |
These NIRF parameters are not applied identically to every list. The report says the data draws on “around 19 sub-parameters, depending upon a given category or a subject domain”, and the discipline specific details sit in the separate ranking documents published on the NIRF website. Anyone comparing a college score with a university score should read the document for each list first.
The weighting explains why the Overall NIRF ranking tends to favour large, research intensive public institutions. Research and teaching resources together carry 60 per cent of the score, and publications and citations alone account for 70 of the 100 research marks.
Where the NIRF ranking data comes from
Most of the input to the NIRF ranking is self reported. Institutions file their figures through an Online Data Capturing System, in which the previous year’s faculty data is pre-filled and any changes must be explained. Applications for the 2025 edition were due by 31 January 2025.
Research data comes from outside the institution. The report names Scopus and Web of Science for publications and citations, Derwent Innovation for patents, and Journal Citation Reports for first quartile data in the Research Institutions list. Perception scores come from an online Perception Capturing System that collects views from academic peers and employers in a prescribed format.
Checks are layered on top. Expert committees flag outliers and institutions may be asked by phone or email for documentary evidence. For the 2025 cycle, public comments were invited from 21 March to 2 April 2025 and passed to institutions without naming the commenter. Each institution was also advised to publish its submitted data on its own website.

The report is explicit about where liability rests: “the final responsibility for the accuracy of the submitted data lies with the concerned institutions.” For governing bodies, that makes the NIRF submission a compliance document as much as a marketing input, because the same figures sit on the institution’s public website for anyone to compare.
Changes to NIRF parameters in recent editions
Two adjustments to the NIRF ranking target research integrity. From 2024 the framework removed institution level self-citations from the citation count, and the 2025 report confirms this continued. In 2025 it added negative marking for retracted publications in the Overall, Engineering, Universities and Research Institutions lists.
The teaching sub-parameters also now reflect the National Education Policy. Online education carries 10 marks, and multiple entry and exit, the Indian Knowledge System and regional languages carry 5 marks between them within Teaching, Learning and Resources.
Who qualifies and how many are ranked
Eligibility rules for the NIRF ranking vary by list. For the Overall NIRF ranking, the 2025 report requires “at least 1,000 students enrolled for various courses at undergraduate and post graduate level”, at least three graduated batches and a minimum faculty student ratio. For Research Institutions, institutions with more than 500 peer reviewed papers or at least 1,000 PhD students were considered.
An institution can apply for the Overall list and for one or more categories or subject domains at the same time, so the same university may appear on several lists with different ranks. Not every list publishes a full order of merit, as the table below shows for the 2025 edition.
| List (2025) | Individually ranked | Rank bands published |
|---|---|---|
| Overall, Universities | Top 100 | 101 to 150, 151 to 200 |
| Colleges, Engineering | Top 100 | 101 to 150, 151 to 200, 201 to 300 |
| Management, Pharmacy | Top 100 | 101 to 125 |
| State Public Universities | Top 50 | 51 to 100 |
| Innovation, Sustainable Development Goals | Top 10 | 11 to 50 |
| Open Universities, Skill Universities | 3 each | None |
Research Institutions, Architecture and Planning, Law, Medical, Dental, and Agriculture and Allied Sectors each ranked roughly 40 to 50 institutions in 2025, according to the report.
Who led the NIRF ranking in 2025
The Overall list for 2025 placed Indian Institute of Technology Madras first with a score of 87.31, followed by the Indian Institute of Science in Bengaluru with 85.00.
The ministry press release lists the other leaders. IISc topped Universities and Research Institutions, Hindu College in Delhi led Colleges, IIM Ahmedabad led Management, IGNOU led Open Universities and Jadavpur University led State Public Universities. IIT Madras also topped Engineering, Innovation and the new Sustainable Development Goals list.
Akashvani’s news report on the release adds that the National Law School of India University, Bengaluru, led the Law list. The domestic picture differs from global tables: Indian institutions are absent from the top 250 of the THE World University Rankings 2027, which uses a different method.
Why the National Institutional Ranking Framework matters for funding
The clearest financial link is the PM Vidyalaxmi education loan scheme approved by the Union Cabinet on 6 November 2024. According to the government’s press release, it covers students at quality higher education institutions defined as those “ranked within the top 100 in NIRF in overall, category-specific and domain specific rankings”.
The same definition takes in state government institutions ranked 101 to 200 and all central government institutions, giving 860 institutions and more than 22 lakh students at the start.

Loans of up to Rs 7.5 lakh carry a 75 per cent government credit guarantee and are collateral free and guarantor free.
Students with annual family income up to Rs 8 lakh who receive no other government scholarship or interest subvention can get 3 per cent interest subvention on loans up to Rs 10 lakh during the moratorium. For a private institution, falling out of the top 100 on every relevant NIRF ranking list therefore changes what its students can borrow on these terms.
The NIRF ranking for 2026 and what comes next
As of November 2026, the rankings menu on the NIRF website still showed 2025 as the most recent edition. The ministry has not published a release date for India Rankings 2026 on the portal.
Careers360 reported on 6 September 2026 that the data capturing system for the 2026 cycle opened on 6 January 2026 and closed on 16 March 2026. FindMyCollege reported on 9 October 2026 that the 2026 edition had not been released and that no revised date had been announced, citing unnamed reports of closer scrutiny of research data. Neither claim has been confirmed by the ministry.
When the next edition appears, the questions for institutions are practical: whether the weights or sub-parameters have changed, whether the penalty for retracted papers extends to further lists, and whether any new category is added. Each of those changes the inputs a registrar’s office has to prepare for the following cycle of the National Institutional Ranking Framework.



